We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. Rankings are formula-based and never paid for. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Disclosure

Friedrich Kühl KCVS12B10B vs Friedrich CCV12A10A

Two of the window air conditioners in our best window air conditioners comparison, lined up spec by spec. Every figure comes from the manufacturer pages linked below, and the scores use the same published formula as the full ranking.

Affiliate disclosure: We earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It never affects our rankings, which come from the published scoring formula. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more.

#7 of 36 in Window Air Conditioners

Friedrich Kühl KCVS12B10B

6.9/10

Best for: Official 12300 Btu/h cooling capacity, CEER 16.2, ENERGY STAR Most Efficient, window-straddling installation

Check price at Amazon
#29 of 36 in Window Air Conditioners

Friedrich CCV12A10A

4.4/10

Best for: Official 12000 Btu/h cooling capacity, CEER 15, window-straddling installation

Check price at Amazon

Spec-by-spec comparison

Green marks the better published figure. "Not listed" means the manufacturer doesn't publish it.

SpecFriedrich Kühl KCVS12B10BFriedrich CCV12A10AWeight
ENERGY STAR CEEROfficial ENERGY STAR combined energy efficiency ratio. Higher is more efficient. Missing values take the category minimum. 16.2 15 32%
Cooling capacityOfficial ENERGY STAR cooling capacity in Btu/h. Missing values take the category minimum. Size the unit to the room; the highest capacity is not always the right fit. 12300 Btu/h 12000 Btu/h 24%
ENERGY STAR Most EfficientYes when the official ENERGY STAR record marks Most Efficient as Yes. Unstated counts as no. Yes No 18%
Window-straddling installationYes when the official ENERGY STAR record lists a mounting type that straddles the window or windowsill. Unstated or 'does not straddle' counts as no. Yes Yes 14%
Heating modeYes when the official ENERGY STAR record lists a heating mode. Unstated counts as no. No No 12%
Cooling capacity (ENERGY STAR)12300 Btu/h12000 Btu/hinfo
Combined energy efficiency ratio (ENERGY STAR CEER)16.215info
ENERGY STAR Most EfficientYesNoinfo
Heating mode (ENERGY STAR)NoNoinfo
Variable-speed compressor (ENERGY STAR)YesYesinfo
Installation / mounting (ENERGY STAR)Straddles WindowsillDoes Not Straddle Window or Windowsillinfo
Window-straddling installationYesYesinfo
Voltage (ENERGY STAR)115 V115 Vinfo
Annual energy use (ENERGY STAR)569 kWh/year600 kWh/yearinfo
Weight (ENERGY STAR)110 lb58.6 lbinfo
Dimensions (ENERGY STAR)15.9 × 25.9 × 29.0 in (H × W × D)13.4 × 20.7 × 19.3 in (H × W × D)info
Product type (ENERGY STAR)WindowWindowinfo
Refrigerant (ENERGY STAR)R-32R-32info
Certified model numberKCVS12B10BCCV12A10Ainfo
Estimated cooling power (computed)759 watts, computed as certified capacity ÷ CEER800 watts, computed as certified capacity ÷ CEERinfo
CoolPick score6.9/104.4/10100%

Where each one comes out ahead

Friedrich Kühl KCVS12B10B

Better published figure on: ENERGY STAR CEER, Cooling capacity, ENERGY STAR Most Efficient.

What we like

  • Official ENERGY STAR CEER of 16.2
  • Marked ENERGY STAR Most Efficient on the official record
  • ENERGY STAR lists a window-straddling installation (typical of U-shaped designs)

Watch out for

  • ENERGY STAR does not list a heating mode

Friedrich CCV12A10A

No scored spec where it is strictly ahead; its case rests on the strengths below.

What we like

  • ENERGY STAR lists a window-straddling installation (typical of U-shaped designs)

Watch out for

  • Not marked ENERGY STAR Most Efficient on the official record
  • ENERGY STAR does not list a heating mode

Verdict

The Friedrich Kühl KCVS12B10B record lists 12,300 Btu/h, a CEER of 16.2, Most Efficient status and a window-straddling installation. The Friedrich CCV12A10A record lists 12,000 Btu/h, a CEER of 15, no Most Efficient mark, and a mounting type that does not straddle the window.

Friedrich Kühl KCVS12B10B on AmazonFriedrich CCV12A10A on Amazon
Spec sources

Related comparisons